
The Problem
HOW OSCILAR HELPS
Automated Case Building
Transaction monitoring alerts become cases with context, customer profile and flagged transactions already summarized.
Risk Scoring
Each alert gets a low, medium or high risk level, so analysts know where to look harder.
Analyst in Control
The agent assesses and drafts. Every disposition, escalation and filing stays with your analyst.
SOP-driven Analysis
Your procedures and typologies drive each assessment, with flagged and cleared typologies explained.
Narratives in Your Format
Case and SAR narratives drafted from the evidence, ready for the analyst to review and file.
Traceable Reasoning
Per-typology reasoning and trace metadata stay on the case for QA and exams.
Included Agents
1
Alert enters the queue
A transaction monitoring alert lands in your L1 queue.
2
Case is built
Customer profile, flagged transactions and linked alerts, plus cited public-source research.
3
Risk assessed
Each configured typology is marked flagged or not flagged, with an overall risk level.
4
Narrative drafted
Case Narrative drafts the write-up. SAR Narrative drafts the filing when the case calls for one.
5
Analyst decides
Your analyst makes the disposition, and the decision is saved to the case.
Ready for deployment.
Safe
Shadow test or A/B test new L1 and QC versions before they touch live alerts.
Trustworthy
Narratives are scored against your approved examples by an LLM evaluator.
Defensible
Every recommendation records the agent version and config, and exports as a PDF.







